๐ŸŒ

Analytical Perspectives on Climate Policy

Agent Progress
Built
Keywords
๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์  ๊ด€์  / ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ / ์ดํ–‰ / ์„ฑ๊ณผ
Lesson #
S
Done
Section
Advanced Vocabulary
๐ŸŒ
TL;DR ๐Ÿฆ„
  • ๐ŸŒก๏ธ ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ… means โ€œclimate policyโ€: public plans, laws, targets, and systems for responding to climate change.
  • ๐Ÿค ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ (international agreement) often creates the promise; ์ดํ–‰ (implementation/fulfillment) asks whether the promise becomes action.
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Strong analysis evaluates ๋ชฉํ‘œ (goals), ์ˆ˜๋‹จ (means), ์„ฑ๊ณผ (outcomes), ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ (practical effectiveness), and ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ (fairness/equity).
๐ŸŽง
๐ŸŽง Iru Helper Note
Type any Korean phrase from this lesson into
Korean Helper Widgets
Korean Helper Widgets
to hear it aloud. Advanced policy terms like ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ (greenhouse gas reduction target), ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ (policy implementation), and ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ (outcome evaluation) become friendlier once your ears recognize them as chunks. ๐Ÿ”Š

๐ŸŒˆ The Big Picture

Climate-policy writing rarely stops at โ€œclimate change is serious.โ€ Advanced Korean analysis asks sharper questions: What did the policy promise? Was it implemented? Did emissions actually fall? Who paid the cost? Did the policy match international commitments? ๐ŸŒฑ
The phrase ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์  ๊ด€์  means โ€œan analytical perspective on climate policy.โ€ It is not just an opinion like โ€œgoodโ€ or โ€œbad.โ€ It is a structured way to evaluate climate action using evidence, criteria, and trade-offs.
A useful policy-analysis chain looks like this:
  • ๐ŸŽฏ ๋ชฉํ‘œ (goal): What is the policy trying to achieve?
  • ๐Ÿค ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ (international agreement): What commitment or framework supports it?
  • ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ์ดํ–‰ (implementation): What systems, budget, and rules make it real?
  • ๐Ÿ“Š ์„ฑ๊ณผ (outcome/achievement): What changed after the policy?
  • โš–๏ธ ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ (equity/fairness): Were costs and benefits distributed fairly?

๐ŸŽจ The Core Climate-Policy Analysis Family

๐ŸŒก๏ธ ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ… โ€” climate policy

๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ… refers to responses to climate change: laws, taxes, public investment, energy-transition plans, emissions rules, and adaptation strategies.
Natural partners:
  • ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to establish climate policy
  • ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to put climate policy into effect
  • ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ the practical effectiveness of climate policy

๐Ÿค ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ โ€” international agreement

๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ means an international agreement or convention. In climate contexts, it often explains why countries set targets or report progress.
Useful related terms:
  • ํŒŒ๋ฆฌํ˜‘์ • โ†’ Paris Agreement
  • ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์ฑ…๋ฌด โ†’ international responsibility
  • ๊ณต๋™ ๋Œ€์‘ โ†’ joint response
  • ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ณ„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ โ†’ nationally determined contribution / national contribution plan

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ์ดํ–‰ โ€” implementation, fulfillment

์ดํ–‰ is stronger than simply โ€œdoing.โ€ It means carrying out a promise, obligation, agreement, or policy.
Natural partners:
  • ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to implement/fulfill an agreement
  • ์˜๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to fulfill an obligation
  • ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰์„ ์ ๊ฒ€ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to check policy implementation
  • ์ดํ–‰ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ โ†’ implementation plan

๐Ÿ“Š ์„ฑ๊ณผ, ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ, ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ โ€” outcome and effectiveness

์„ฑ๊ณผ means a meaningful result or achievement, not just any result. ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ asks whether something works in practice. ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ asks whether it achieves the intended effect.
Keep these apart:
  • ์„ฑ๊ณผ โ†’ evaluated outcome or achievement
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness in the real world
  • ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ โ†’ effectiveness in achieving the intended result
  • ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ†’ efficiency; using fewer resources

โš–๏ธ ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ€” equity, fairness

ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ is essential when climate policy creates costs. A carbon tax may reduce emissions, but who carries the burden? Households? Industries? Low-income groups? That is the equity question.

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ How They Work in a Sentence

1. Link policy to international commitments

  • ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
    • The government established a new climate policy to implement reduction targets under an international agreement. ๐Ÿค
    • ์ •๋ถ€ = government; ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ = reduction target; ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค = to establish/prepare.

2. Evaluate implementation

  • ์ด ์ •์ฑ…์€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ดํ–‰ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
    • This policy has clear goals, but it has the limitation that concrete implementation plans are lacking. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ
    • ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๋‹ค = to be clear; ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ = concrete/specific; ํ•œ๊ณ„ = limitation.

3. Judge outcomes and fairness

  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ผ๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์˜ ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ์€ ๋” ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
    • Achievement appeared in the form of reduced emissions, but the fairness of cost burdens must be examined further. โš–๏ธ
    • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ = reduction in emissions; ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ€๋‹ด = cost burden; ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋‹ค = to review/examine.

๐Ÿงฉ General Formation Rule

This lesson is vocabulary-and-analysis focused. Build polished climate-policy sentences with these frames:
Frame 1: Agreement โ†’ target
  • A๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • A set a reduction target according to an international agreement.
Frame 2: Promise โ†’ implementation
  • ์„ ์–ธ์— ๊ทธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ดํ–‰์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ ธ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • It should not stop at a declaration but lead to concrete implementation.
Frame 3: Outcome evaluation
  • ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • A policyโ€™s outcomes should be evaluated by whether actual emissions decreased.
Frame 4: Effectiveness + equity
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๋ ค๋ฉด ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • To improve practical effectiveness, equity issues must also be considered.
No irregular conjugation rule is central here. The โ€œgrammarโ€ is analytical structure: promise โ†’ implementation โ†’ evidence โ†’ fairness. Very neat, very policy-brief-with-highlighters. ๐Ÿ–๏ธ

๐Ÿ“š Cross-check note

The core vocabulary and collocations in this lesson were cross-checked against ๊ตญ๋ฆฝ๊ตญ์–ด์› and Korean.go.kr-style usage, especially ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค, ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ, ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋‹ค, ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ, ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ, and ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ. โœ…

๐Ÿชž Synonym Alert

  • ์ดํ–‰ โ†’ implementation/fulfillment. Formal; used for obligations, policies, agreements, and promises.
  • ์‹คํ–‰ โ†’ execution/action. More general; focuses on carrying something out.
  • ์‹œํ–‰ โ†’ putting into effect. Often used for laws, systems, and policies after they officially begin.
  • ์„ฑ๊ณผ โ†’ achievement/outcome. Evaluated, meaningful result.
  • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ โ†’ result. Neutral and broader.
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness. โ€œDoes it actually work?โ€
  • ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ โ†’ effectiveness. โ€œDoes it achieve the intended effect?โ€
  • ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ†’ efficiency. โ€œDoes it use resources well?โ€
  • ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ†’ equity/fairness, especially about burdens and benefits.

โš ๏ธ Pitfalls to Dodge

  • โŒ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. โ†’ โœ… ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ–ˆ๋‹ค. / ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. (Use precise academic verbs instead of vague ํ•˜๋‹ค.) ๐Ÿ“
  • โŒ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. โ†’ โœ… ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. / ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ดํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. (Agreements are concluded or implemented.) ๐Ÿค
  • โŒ ์„ฑ๊ณผ = any result โ†’ โœ… ์„ฑ๊ณผ usually means a meaningful achievement or evaluated outcome. ๐Ÿ“Š
  • โŒ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ = effectiveness โ†’ โœ… ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ means efficiency; use ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ or ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ for effectiveness. โš™๏ธ
  • โŒ Only praising a policyโ€™s goal โ†’ โœ… Evaluate ๋ชฉํ‘œ, ์ดํ–‰, ์„ฑ๊ณผ, and ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ together. ๐Ÿงญ
You now have the vocabulary to judge climate policy like a calm analyst with a reusable water bottle and a suspiciously organized spreadsheet. ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ“Š
Try this exercise
Choose the best analytical vocabulary for each sentence. Read the full sentence first, then check the Answer toggle.
1. ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์€ ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ์‹คํžˆ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
Under an international agreement, each country must faithfully implement its reduction target. ๐Ÿค
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค means to carry out or fulfill a reduction target.
2. ์ •์ฑ…์ด ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ ๋ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
When evaluating whether a policy actually works, we must look at practical effectiveness. ๐Ÿ”
Answer
์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ€” ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ asks whether something works in practice.
3. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์ถ• ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The government established a concrete reduction plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ๐ŸŒซ๏ธ
Answer
๋งˆ๋ จ โ€” ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค is more academic than vague ๊ณ„ํš์„ ํ•˜๋‹ค.
4. ์ •์ฑ… ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€๋‹ดํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋‹ค.
Who bears policy costs is a matter of equity. โš–๏ธ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ€” This word fits fairness in burden-sharing.
5. ์„ ์–ธ์— ๊ทธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ •์ฑ… ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ ธ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
It should not stop at a declaration but lead to concrete policy implementation. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ means policy implementation.
6. ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ค„์—ˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
If emissions actually decreased, we can say a certain outcome/achievement appeared. ๐Ÿ“‰
Answer
์„ฑ๊ณผ โ€” This is an evaluated, meaningful result.
7. ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋งž์ถฐ ๋†์—… ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ์ „๋žต์ด๋‹ค.
Adjusting farming methods to climate change is an adaptation strategy. ๐ŸŒพ
Answer
์ ์‘ โ€” ์ ์‘ means adaptation.
8. ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ์ž์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์€ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ์ •์ฑ…์— ๊ฐ€๊น๋‹ค.
A policy that reduces greenhouse gas emissions themselves is closer to mitigation policy. ๐ŸŒซ๏ธ
Answer
์™„ํ™” โ€” ์™„ํ™” means mitigation in climate-policy language.
9. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋‹ฌ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๋œ๋‹ค.
The new law will be put into effect starting next month. ๐Ÿ“œ
Answer
์‹œํ–‰ โ€” ๋ฒ•์ด ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๋‹ค means a law goes into effect.
10. ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋” ์ ์€ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
If the same outcome was achieved with a smaller budget, we can say efficiency is high. ๐Ÿ’ฐ
Answer
ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ€” ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ is about using fewer resources, not just being effective.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ โ†’ international agreement
  • ๊ฐ๊ตญ โ†’ each country
  • ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ โ†’ reduction target
  • ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to implement; fulfill
  • ์ •์ฑ… โ†’ policy
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness
  • ์ •๋ถ€ โ†’ government
  • ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฐฐ์ถœ โ†’ greenhouse gas emissions
  • ๊ฐ์ถ• ๊ณ„ํš โ†’ reduction plan
  • ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to establish; prepare
  • ๋น„์šฉ โ†’ cost
  • ๋ถ€๋‹ดํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to bear; shoulder
  • ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ†’ equity; fairness
  • ์„ ์–ธ โ†’ declaration
  • ์„ฑ๊ณผ โ†’ outcome; achievement
  • ์ ์‘ โ†’ adaptation
  • ์™„ํ™” โ†’ mitigation
  • ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๋‹ค โ†’ to go into effect
  • ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ†’ efficiency
Tips ๐Ÿ’ก
  • ์ดํ–‰ often follows a promise or obligation.
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ asks whether a policy works in reality.
  • ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ asks who carries the burden.

๐Ÿš€
Want more reps? Visit the Practice Hub when you're ready!
๐Ÿ“ฆ
๐ŸŽฏ Practice Hub โ€” Analytical Perspectives on Climate Policy
Welcome to your climate-policy analysis gym. ๐ŸŒ Youโ€™ll practice reading Korean policy sentences with a sharper eye: goals, agreements, implementation, outcomes, and fairness. By the end, your analysis will sound less like โ€œpolicy good?โ€ and more like โ€œwhere is the implementation mechanism and who bears the distributional burden?โ€ Tiny scholar cape included. ๐Ÿฆธ
๐Ÿ”Š Audio reminder: Use
Korean Helper Widgets
Korean Helper Widgets
whenever you want to hear a full sentence aloud.
๐Ÿ“ Instructions: Complete each Korean sentence with the best word or phrase. Focus on the analytical job each word does: promise, action, result, fairness, or practical effect.

Exercise 1 โ€” Agreements and Targets ๐Ÿค

A. ๊ฐ๊ตญ์€ ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ œ์ถœํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
Each country submitted greenhouse gas reduction targets under an international agreement. ๐ŸŒซ๏ธ
Answer
๊ฐ์ถ• โ€” ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ means greenhouse gas reduction target.
B. ํŒŒ๋ฆฌํ˜‘์ •์€ ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๋Œ€์‘์˜ ํ‹€์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.
The Paris Agreement provides a framework for joint response to climate change. ๐ŸŒ
Answer
๊ณต๋™ โ€” ๊ณต๋™ ๋Œ€์‘ means joint response.
C. ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์ฑ…๋ฌด๋ฅผ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The country adjusted domestic policy to fulfill its international responsibility. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ์ฑ…๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค means to fulfill a responsibility.
D. ์ƒˆ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ํƒ„์†Œ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The new agreement emphasized a long-term carbon-neutrality goal. ๐ŸŽฏ
Answer
๋ชฉํ‘œ โ€” ํƒ„์†Œ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๋ชฉํ‘œ means a carbon-neutrality goal.
E. ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋งŒ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ตญ์ œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
Because climate change is not one countryโ€™s problem, international cooperation is necessary. ๐Ÿค
Answer
ํ˜‘๋ ฅ โ€” ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ means international cooperation.
F. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ณ„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The government newly presented its national contribution plan. ๐Ÿ“„
Answer
์ œ์‹œ โ€” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋‹ค means to present a plan/measure.
G. ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ง€ํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.
Concluding an agreement is easier than actually keeping it. โœ๏ธ
Answer
์ฒด๊ฒฐ โ€” ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋‹ค means to conclude/sign an agreement.
H. ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„๋„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉด ์‹คํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.
Even if reduction targets are high, they are hard to realize without implementation measures. ๐Ÿงฐ
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ์ดํ–‰ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ means means of implementation.
I. ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๊ฐ€ ๋œ๋‹ค.
Each countryโ€™s report becomes a basis for evaluating whether targets were achieved. ๐Ÿ“Š
Answer
ํ‰๊ฐ€ โ€” ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋‹ค means to evaluate whether something happened.
J. ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์€ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
An international agreement can influence the direction of domestic policy. ๐Ÿงญ
Answer
์˜ํ–ฅ โ€” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋‹ค means to influence or affect.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ๊ฐ๊ตญ โ†’ each country
  • ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ โ†’ international agreement
  • ์˜จ์‹ค๊ฐ€์Šค โ†’ greenhouse gas
  • ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ โ†’ reduction target
  • ์ œ์ถœํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to submit
  • ํŒŒ๋ฆฌํ˜‘์ • โ†’ Paris Agreement
  • ๊ณต๋™ ๋Œ€์‘ โ†’ joint response
  • ํ‹€ โ†’ framework
  • ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์ฑ…๋ฌด โ†’ international responsibility
  • ์ดํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to fulfill; implement
  • ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์ •์ฑ… โ†’ domestic policy
  • ํƒ„์†Œ์ค‘๋ฆฝ โ†’ carbon neutrality
  • ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ โ†’ international cooperation
  • ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ณ„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ โ†’ national contribution plan
  • ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to present
  • ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to conclude an agreement
  • ์ดํ–‰ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ โ†’ implementation measure
  • ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to evaluate
  • ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋‹ค โ†’ to influence
Tip ๐Ÿ’ก Agreement language often follows this chain: ํ˜‘์•ฝ ์ฒด๊ฒฐ โ†’ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ œ์‹œ โ†’ ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ โ†’ ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€.

Exercise 2 โ€” Implementation Mechanics ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

A. ์ •์ฑ…์ด ์„ ์–ธ์— ๊ทธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
For a policy not to stop at a declaration, concrete implementation plans are necessary. ๐Ÿ“‹
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ์ดํ–‰ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ means implementation plan.
B. ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์ด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ๊ฐ์ถ• ์‚ฌ์—…์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
A sufficient budget must be secured to proceed with reduction projects. ๐Ÿ’ฐ
Answer
ํ™•๋ณด โ€” ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋‹ค means to secure a budget.
C. ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ œ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ์ •์ฑ… ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.
Policy implementation is possible only when laws and systems support it. โš–๏ธ
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ means implementation of policy.
D. ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์‚ฐ์—… ์ „ํ™˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
To achieve reduction targets, an institutional foundation for industrial transition is needed. ๐Ÿญ
Answer
์ œ๋„์  โ€” ์ œ๋„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ means institutional foundation.
E. ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์–ด๊ธด ๊ธฐ์—…์„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
Strong enforcement capacity is needed to manage companies that violate emissions standards. ๐Ÿšจ
Answer
์ง‘ํ–‰๋ ฅ โ€” ์ง‘ํ–‰๋ ฅ means enforcement capacity.
F. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ์žฌ์ƒ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํ™•๋Œ€ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The government implemented the renewable-energy expansion policy in stages. โ˜€๏ธ
Answer
์‹œํ–‰ โ€” ์ •์ฑ…์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค means to put a policy into effect.
G. ๊ณ„ํš๋งŒ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง„๋‹ค.
If a plan is only announced and not executed, the policyโ€™s practical effectiveness decreases. ๐Ÿ“‰
Answer
์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ€” Practical effectiveness depends on real execution.
H. ์ง€๋ฐฉ ์ •๋ถ€์™€ ์ค‘์•™ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋ฉด ์ดํ–‰ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ ค์ง„๋‹ค.
If coordination between local and central government is lacking, implementation slows. ๐Ÿ™๏ธ
Answer
์กฐ์œจ โ€” ์กฐ์œจ means coordination or adjustment.
I. ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ณ„์† ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•ด์•ผ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
We must continuously monitor the policy implementation process to find problems quickly. ๐Ÿ”Ž
Answer
์ ๊ฒ€ โ€” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ ๊ฒ€ํ•˜๋‹ค means to inspect/check a process.
J. ์ƒˆ ์ œ๋„๋Š” ๋‚ด๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ „๊ตญ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๋  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค.
The new system is expected to be implemented nationwide starting next year. ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ
Answer
์‹œํ–‰ โ€” ์ œ๋„๊ฐ€ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๋‹ค means a system goes into effect.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ์ •์ฑ… โ†’ policy
  • ์„ ์–ธ โ†’ declaration
  • ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ โ†’ concrete; specific
  • ์ดํ–‰ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ โ†’ implementation plan
  • ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ โ†’ budget
  • ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to secure
  • ๊ฐ์ถ• ์‚ฌ์—… โ†’ reduction project
  • ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ œ๋„ โ†’ laws and institutions
  • ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจ๋˜๋‹ค โ†’ to be supported
  • ์ •์ฑ… ์ดํ–‰ โ†’ policy implementation
  • ๊ฐ์ถ• ๋ชฉํ‘œ โ†’ reduction target
  • ์‚ฐ์—… ์ „ํ™˜ โ†’ industrial transition
  • ์ œ๋„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ โ†’ institutional foundation
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ธฐ์ค€ โ†’ emissions standard
  • ์–ด๊ธฐ๋‹ค โ†’ to violate
  • ์ง‘ํ–‰๋ ฅ โ†’ enforcement capacity
  • ์žฌ์ƒ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ โ†’ renewable energy
  • ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to put into effect
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness
  • ์กฐ์œจ โ†’ coordination
  • ์ ๊ฒ€ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to check; inspect
Tip ๐Ÿ’ก Implementation analysis asks, โ€œWhat makes the promise real?โ€ Look for budget, institutions, enforcement, coordination, and monitoring.

Exercise 3 โ€” Outcomes and Evidence ๐Ÿ“Š

A. ์ •์ฑ… ์‹œํ–‰ ์ดํ›„ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ค„์—ˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ ์ธ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.
If emissions decreased after policy implementation, visible achievement appeared. ๐Ÿ“‰
Answer
์„ฑ๊ณผ โ€” ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๊ณผ means visible achievement/outcome.
B. ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
Objective evidence is needed to judge a policyโ€™s effect. ๐Ÿ”
Answer
๊ทผ๊ฑฐ โ€” ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ means objective basis/evidence.
C. ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ •์ฑ… ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.
It is difficult to evaluate policy outcomes only from the fact that targets were announced. ๐Ÿ“„
Answer
์„ฑ๊ณผ โ€” Outcomes require evidence of change, not just announcements.
D. ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ๊ฐ์ถ• ์ •์ฑ…์ด ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
An actual reduction in emissions must be confirmed before saying the reduction policy was effective. ๐ŸŒซ๏ธ
Answer
๊ฐ์†Œ โ€” ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ means reduction in emissions.
E. ์ •์ฑ… ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์‹œํ–‰ ์ „ํ›„์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
To compare policy outcomes, data before and after implementation must be analyzed. ๐Ÿ“Š
Answer
๋ถ„์„ โ€” ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋‹ค means to analyze data.
F. ํƒ„์†Œ์„ธ ๋„์ž… ์ดํ›„ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„๊ฐ€ ์ค„์—ˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
If energy consumption decreased after the introduction of a carbon tax, we can say it has some effectiveness. โšก
Answer
ํšจ๊ณผ โ€” ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ means effectiveness in producing the intended effect.
G. ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐ์ถ• ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋” ์ ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค.
If the same reduction effect was achieved at lower cost, efficiency is high. ๐Ÿ’ฐ
Answer
ํšจ์œจ โ€” ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ focuses on resource use.
H. ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ œ๋„๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋น„ํŒ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค.
A system that does not work on the ground is criticized for low practical effectiveness. ๐Ÿ—๏ธ
Answer
์‹คํšจ โ€” ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ means real-world practical effectiveness.
I. ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
Outcome evaluation must consider both short-term results and long-term change. ๐Ÿงญ
Answer
๊ณ ๋ ค โ€” ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋‹ค means to consider together.
J. ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋ฉด ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.
If data is insufficient, it is difficult to verify the policyโ€™s actual impact. ๐Ÿงช
Answer
๊ฒ€์ฆ โ€” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋‹ค means to verify impact.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ์ •์ฑ… ์‹œํ–‰ โ†’ policy implementation/enforcement
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ โ†’ emissions amount
  • ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๊ณผ โ†’ visible achievement
  • ํšจ๊ณผ โ†’ effect
  • ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ โ†’ objective evidence/basis
  • ๋ชฉํ‘œ โ†’ goal; target
  • ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to announce
  • ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to evaluate
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ โ†’ emissions reduction
  • ํ™•์ธ๋˜๋‹ค โ†’ to be confirmed
  • ์ž๋ฃŒ โ†’ data; materials
  • ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to analyze
  • ํƒ„์†Œ์„ธ โ†’ carbon tax
  • ๋„์ž… โ†’ introduction
  • ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„ โ†’ energy consumption
  • ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ โ†’ effectiveness
  • ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ†’ efficiency
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness
  • ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ โ†’ outcome evaluation
  • ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to verify
Tip ๐Ÿ’ก Evidence words keep analysis from becoming vague praise. Ask: What changed, how do we know, and at what cost?

Exercise 4 โ€” Equity and Trade-offs โš–๏ธ

A. ํƒ„์†Œ์„ธ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์„ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ €์†Œ๋“์ธต์˜ ๋น„์šฉ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
A carbon tax can reduce emissions, but it may increase the cost burden on low-income groups. ๐Ÿ’ธ
Answer
๋ถ€๋‹ด โ€” ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ€๋‹ด means cost burden.
B. ์ •์ฑ… ๋ถ€๋‹ด์ด ๊ณต์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜๋‰˜๋Š”์ง€๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋‹ค.
Whether policy burdens are fairly divided is an issue of equity. โš–๏ธ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰ โ€” ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ means equity/fairness.
C. ์‚ฐ์—… ์ „ํ™˜ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋…ธ๋™์ž์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ฑ…์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.
Support measures are needed to reduce harm to workers during industrial transition. ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿญ
Answer
์ง€์› โ€” ์ง€์›์ฑ… means support measure.
D. ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
Climate policy must consider environmental effects and social equity together. ๐ŸŒฑ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ€” Equity belongs beside social impact and burden-sharing.
E. ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ถŒ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์—…์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ ๋‚ณ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
An emissions trading system can produce the side effect of increasing company costs. ๐Ÿญ
Answer
๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ โ€” ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ means side effect or unintended consequence.
F. ์ทจ์•ฝ ๊ณ„์ธต์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ์ •์ฑ…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ์•ฝํ•ด์ง„๋‹ค.
If vulnerable groups are not protected, social acceptance of the policy weakens. ๐Ÿ˜๏ธ
Answer
์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ โ€” ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ means social acceptance.
G. ์นœํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ „ํ™˜์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ํ• ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜๊ฐ€ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ•˜๋‹ค.
Discussion about who receives the costs of eco-friendly transition is necessary. โ™ป๏ธ
Answer
ํ•„์š” โ€” ๋…ผ์˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค means discussion is necessary.
H. ์ •์ฑ…์ด ํŠน์ • ์ง€์—ญ์—๋งŒ ์†ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ค€๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ง€์—ญ ๊ฐ„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๊ธด๋‹ค.
If a policy harms only a certain region, an equity problem between regions arises. ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ€” The sentence is about fairness between regions.
I. ์ „ํ™˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ๊ธˆ์€ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
Subsidies to reduce transition costs can increase the policyโ€™s acceptability. ๐Ÿงพ
Answer
์ˆ˜์šฉ โ€” ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ means acceptability.
J. ๊ณต์ •ํ•œ ์ „ํ™˜์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๋ณดํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•œ๋‹ค.
A just transition connects environmental goals and social protection in a balanced way. โš–๏ธ
Answer
๊ท ํ˜• โ€” ๊ท ํ˜• ์žˆ๊ฒŒ means in a balanced way.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ํƒ„์†Œ์„ธ โ†’ carbon tax
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ โ†’ emissions
  • ์ €์†Œ๋“์ธต โ†’ low-income group
  • ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ€๋‹ด โ†’ cost burden
  • ์ •์ฑ… ๋ถ€๋‹ด โ†’ policy burden
  • ๊ณต์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ โ†’ fairly
  • ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ†’ equity; fairness
  • ์‚ฐ์—… ์ „ํ™˜ โ†’ industrial transition
  • ๋…ธ๋™์ž โ†’ worker
  • ์ง€์›์ฑ… โ†’ support measure
  • ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํšจ๊ณผ โ†’ environmental effect
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ถŒ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์ œ โ†’ emissions trading system
  • ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ โ†’ side effect
  • ์ทจ์•ฝ ๊ณ„์ธต โ†’ vulnerable group
  • ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ โ†’ social acceptance
  • ์นœํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ „ํ™˜ โ†’ eco-friendly transition
  • ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to distribute
  • ์ง€์—ญ ๊ฐ„ โ†’ between regions
  • ๋ณด์กฐ๊ธˆ โ†’ subsidy
  • ๊ณต์ •ํ•œ ์ „ํ™˜ โ†’ just transition
  • ๊ท ํ˜• ์žˆ๊ฒŒ โ†’ in a balanced way
Tip ๐Ÿ’ก Equity analysis asks who benefits, who pays, who is protected, and whether the policy can gain social acceptance.

Exercise 5 โ€” Mixed Mastery + Pitfall Patrol ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

A. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The government established a climate policy. ๐ŸŒ
Answer
๋งˆ๋ จ โ€” โœ… ์ •์ฑ…์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค is precise. โŒ Avoid vague ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํ•˜๋‹ค.
B. ๋‘ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
The two countries concluded a new environmental agreement. ๐Ÿค
Answer
์ฒด๊ฒฐ โ€” โœ… ํ˜‘์•ฝ์„ ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋‹ค means to conclude/sign an agreement.
C. ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„๋„ ์‹ค์ œ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉด ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.
Even if goals are high, it is hard to expect outcomes without actual implementation. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ
Answer
์ดํ–‰ โ€” โœ… Goals must become implementation. โŒ A declaration alone is not enough.
D. ์ •์ฑ…์ด ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ ค๋ฉด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
To see whether a policy works on the ground, practical effectiveness must be evaluated. ๐Ÿ”Ž
Answer
์‹คํšจ โ€” โœ… ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ asks whether the policy actually works in practice.
E. ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ๊ฒŒ ์“ฐ๊ณ  ๊ฐ™์€ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค.
If the same effect was achieved with lower cost, efficiency is high. ๐Ÿ’ฐ
Answer
ํšจ์œจ โ€” โœ… ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ is resource efficiency. โŒ Do not confuse it with ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ.
F. ๋ชฉํ‘œํ•œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
If the intended emissions reduction was achieved, the policyโ€™s effectiveness can be considered high. ๐Ÿ“‰
Answer
ํšจ๊ณผ โ€” โœ… ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ asks whether the intended effect was achieved.
G. ์ •์ฑ… ๋น„์šฉ์ด ํ•œ ๊ณ„์ธต์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋ฉด ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ ๋…ผ๋ž€์ด ์ƒ๊ธด๋‹ค.
If policy costs are concentrated on one group, an equity controversy arises. โš–๏ธ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰ โ€” โœ… Cost distribution is a ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ issue.
H. ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ธ๋˜๋ฉด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
If emissions reduction is confirmed, we can say there was a certain policy achievement. ๐Ÿ“Š
Answer
์„ฑ๊ณผ โ€” โœ… ์„ฑ๊ณผ is an evaluated achievement, not just any result.
I. ๋†์—…์ด ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋งž์ถฐ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค.
Agriculture changing methods to fit climate change corresponds to adaptation. ๐ŸŒพ
Answer
์ ์‘ โ€” โœ… ์ ์‘ is adaptation; ์™„ํ™” is reducing the cause or severity.
J. ์ •์ฑ… ๋ถ„์„์€ ๊ตญ์ œ ํ˜‘์•ฝ, ์ดํ–‰, ์„ฑ๊ณผ, ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ๏ผฟ์„ฑ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.
Policy analysis must examine international agreements, implementation, outcomes, and equity together. ๐Ÿงญ
Answer
ํ˜•ํ‰ โ€” โœ… A complete analysis checks not only results but also fairness.
๐Ÿ“š
Vocabulary Box
  • ์ •๋ถ€ โ†’ government
  • ๊ธฐํ›„ ์ •์ฑ… โ†’ climate policy
  • ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to establish; prepare
  • ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ˜‘์•ฝ โ†’ environmental agreement
  • ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to conclude an agreement
  • ๋ชฉํ‘œ โ†’ goal; target
  • ์ดํ–‰ โ†’ implementation; fulfillment
  • ์„ฑ๊ณผ โ†’ achievement; outcome
  • ํ˜„์žฅ โ†’ field; real-world site
  • ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ โ†’ practical effectiveness
  • ๋น„์šฉ โ†’ cost
  • ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ โ†’ efficiency
  • ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ โ†’ effectiveness
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ฐ์†Œ โ†’ emissions reduction
  • ๊ณ„์ธต โ†’ social group/class
  • ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋‹ค โ†’ to be concentrated
  • ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ โ†’ equity; fairness
  • ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ์†Œ โ†’ reduction in emissions
  • ๋†์—… โ†’ agriculture
  • ์ ์‘ โ†’ adaptation
  • ๋ถ„์„ โ†’ analysis
  • ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋‹ค โ†’ to examine
Tip ๐Ÿ’ก Final patrol: ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ = works in practice, ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ = achieves intended effect, ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ = uses resources well.
๐ŸŽ‰ You finished the full climate-policy analysis circuit: agreements, implementation, evidence, effectiveness, and fairness. Your Korean now has enough policy vocabulary to politely interrogate a government report. ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ“Š